Monday, June 16, 2008

“He’s really the painter of light. Rembrandt is light on faces; Vermeer is just light, period.” (-Eduardo Serra)




I have always been a huge fan of Jan Vermeer’s paintings: without ever having had the benefit of a camera to aid him in his observations of it, he had such a masterful sense of light and its play on people and objects. He painted mostly interior scenes, and was purportedly very slow in producing only a few paintings a year. Only 35 paintings are firmly attributed to him today.

One of my favorite movies is Girl with a Pearl Earring, not so much for the story, but for the cinematography and the beauty of the lighting. Each scene in that movie resembles a Vermeer painting to me.

I was fortunate that I was able to visit Delft, in the Netherlands, Vermeer's hometown, some years ago. It’s a wonderfully quaint little town and I found myself wondering what it was there that so impacted Vermeer to create the beautiful images he did. Sadly, when he died fairly young, he left his wife with a large family to support and debts to be paid. She was forced to sell paintings and his tools of the trade to erase those debts. He was hardly known outside of his hometown, and when a diplomat came to visit the town and wanted to see some of Vermeer's work, he was sent to the local baker who owned several pieces of art that had been exchanged for bread for Vermeer's family.


“Light is the first of painters. There is no object so foul that intense light will not make it beautiful.” (-Ralph Waldo Emerson)

8 comments:

willow said...

I love Vermeer's paintings, too. Isn't it a shame that only so few remain today? I love the film, too, and thought the very same thing when I first saw it at the theater. Every scene is like one of his works! :)

Cris in Oregon said...

Diddo Willow. Oh that rhymed. lol But I too love his paintings and I have the movie. I love it for the scenes also.
Love the painting of yours that girl in the mirror is awesome,and I see you used your bunny painting on a card cover.. Bravo.

ParisBreakfasts said...

AH HA!
David Hockney's Secret Knowledge says otherwise - that Vermeer probably used the camera obscura to get his imagery onto the canvas.
Lovely watercolor Sue and lovely visit to Delft.
Merci

A Brush with Color said...

Yes, I do believe he used the camera obscura, Carol--but that was just a mechanism that kept an object upside down in his vision and assisted in drawing. It didn't create a photo to study; that's what I meant...

Just Plain Jane said...

Our shop's book discussion group read the book when it first came out and then when I saw the movie, I was completely mesmerized. And surprised, for I usually don't like period movies (that's akin to admitting that I'm not overly fond of cats......I'm sure my character rating goes down several notches with that sort of confession.

A Brush with Color said...

I remember you said you didn't care for period movies as a rule, Jane. And no, that does nothing to change your "character rating!" I never read the book, honestly, but I did think the movie was beautiful, cinematically speaking.

Lavinia Ladyslipper said...

Vermeer was one of the masters, that is certain. So many bloggers recommend this movie; I can't believe I haven't seen it yet!

A Brush with Color said...

I think you'd probably like it, Lavinia! It's a good movie--beautifully filmed.